Which of the following best describes a legal finding that absolves someone of blame?

The term that best describes a legal finding that absolves someone of blame is "acquit." When a person is acquitted, it means that they have been legally cleared of the charges against them, indicating that there is insufficient evidence to establish guilt. An acquittal results from a formal judgment in a court of law, which determines that the accused is not guilty of the crime for which they were on trial.

This distinction is essential in the legal context because an acquittal directly impacts the individual’s legal standing, ensuring they do not face criminal sanctions for the accusations made against them. The concept of being acquitted aligns with the principle that individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty, emphasizing the protection of personal liberties in the justice system.

On the other hand, other terms such as convict refer to a judgment that finds someone guilty, sentence involves the determination of punishment following a conviction, and reprimand usually involves a formal expression of disapproval, rather than a legal judgment related to guilt or innocence. This reinforces how "acquit" specifically relates to absolving blame, distinguishing it clearly from these other legal scenarios.